So the Lord God took the man and put him in the garden of 'Eden to till it and keep giving this order, "You can eat freely of every tree of the garden, but the tree of knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, because if you eat certainly die. When we are going to read a work far into the future by us or belonging to another culture as in this case can be more precisely GEN BIBLE must realize that every work is the daughter of socio-cultural context in which was written. So if we want to understand it better in that context that we groped calarci.Nel of our case is the context of a patriarchal society where institutional figure of the father, brings together all the basic values \u200b\u200bof society, moral values \u200b\u200band decision-making that is politico.Una figure free from errors and sins, so do not be disputed. However, this figure being played by a man subject to error, to save his own image must find an excuse to justify their manchevolezze.La is hurting not some thing that comes to man but that is the voluntary choice of outside a man who in a moment of weakness can soccombervi.Vedi tempted Eve See Adam by the serpent tempted Eve. This concept of evil as an entity that is outside the find in Gothic cathedrals, where the outside walls are represented in a grotesque symbols of sin that can not be stopped by the sacred perimeter accedervi.Questa vision is the total negation of the concept of individual responsibility. "If sin is not my fault but why in a moment of weakness have been defeated by superior forces - It 's the car who does not want to absolve themselves of accountability for their mistakes at this point one could argue that despite this alibi Adam was expelled Eden, but this apparent contradiction is in no way inconsistent with the vision of the writer of Genesis, in fact, reinforces the tesi.Se we read carefully, we realize that it was written for two levels of understanding, an exoteric where so simple and poetic creation is represented and an esoteric act to be understood by iniziati.E 'a Manual politico.dove religion plays as it always was, the task of justifying the politica.E 'the picture of how society should be structured and the balance of power between the various attori.La is a rigidly hierarchical society where those who is under can not afford to criticize those above. Adam is up to God as Eve is to Adamo.La expulsion and punishment from God as Adam's expulsion to death or exile of a criminal in power. It follows that those in power can not be judged by God even more that the figure of Eve, although partner, may be associated with power equal to Adam, or risk losing dominance by the same. Therefore, the figure of Eve that can not be subordinate is then encoded the role of the female, Eve, who leads Adam to disobey the Father. Eva be less because they do not initially designed by God, Eve was born from a desire that God answers Adam's drawing it from a branch of the same Eve that owes its birth to Adam, who becomes father and therefore morally inferior to him and subject E ' the same vision that we still find today in Muslim peoples that a woman raped. raped, humiliated in its essence of being human, is still guilty of being the only woman, and therefore be less tempting. It 's like a thief made it responsible for its actions because it robbed the owner of the object to rob responsibility, free will, do not have citizenship in this type of società.Al up in place of a tyrant, we can hope for an enlightened prince, but never in Giving an equal among peers on one of the points highlighted above would destroy the foundations of this society. Referring to my introduction, let us now read the same passage in the light of our culture, where the figure of the father has above all a duty to protect, promote, make free, love their children and where the power should serve the individual is a culture that goes back to where the Christian message in the parable of the master-DIO-and talent-QUALITIES-date in managing the servants-MEN-servant who is punished does not use the talent to add value and best-but they repent of the burial-RESPONSABILITA' With this parable, man is freed and made accountable for its azioni.Deve to best use the talents that were given is no longer subject to the old law, but its coscienza.E 'This is a real revolution, why the Christ is crucified. It subverts the balance of power until then working in società.Non no longer a man of above a altro.Ognuno is responsible for himself and his actions and is answerable to God and morally to the civilly and criminally società.Date to Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's. It 'a culture that makes the RIGHT to doubt his wins because he who doubts the truth does not accept pre-packaged but the tests recognizing others the same right to criticize Hence the value of tolerance and dialogue of a culture where those in higher a teacher and not a court where one rejoices for those who fell got up a culture that has given me the realization that the human being is the author of free himself by divine will. Now, to prove that man has free will to God must necessarily start from the origin where the sixth day God created man in His own image and likeness wanting,, blowing in the life and gave him the lordship EDEN-putting, however, a condition not eat the fruit of knowledge or else die. - As we shall see later, this ban was the necessary condition to realize the divine plan. Reflect a attimo.Dio created man in His own image and likeness, therefore, potentially able to distinguish right from wrong and therefore free to choose, but the freedom to choose, can not be imposed from outside not from God or they would drop the concept of freedom.
God could not make the man free if the man himself had not made a volitional act. Here is divieto.Non back to eating the fruit that man knows good and evil but they are known at the time that God says "If you do not eat well when eating it is wrong is where the man- loses its innocence - The inconoscenza the concept of good and evil-is why the prohibition is already in inutile.In that time God gave man the concept of good and evil but the man has not yet acquired the freedom because for the freedom we need a voluntary collaboration by man. And 'necessary accountability because freedom is responsibility is the acceptance of the consequences of their choices. So here is the serpent, the temptation, one of the many faces of God, the means necessary to accomplish his design, to force the man to make a choice, and when the man picks the fruit everything is already done. That's just the gesture that seals an acceptance is an initiation, is to pass between the columns, is to assume. Priori the responsibility of what will be after the choice has to be free, is to implement to achieve the intention of God. It could be argued that man could not even grasp the fruit while respecting the dictates of God, but could not farlo.Il His is apparently a sin of pride. If he had not eaten an acknowledged authority outside of his consciousness. An authority which decided for him, would no longer be FREE. Now a reflection. If a religious text you can do two such different readings even antithetical because different is the culture of the reader, where is the truth? It occurs to me that is not God who made us in His image and likeness but we who make a religion indeed a God in our image and somiglianza.Un religion to serve God above all things to justify our moral because remember that the Morality is a reflection of a culture. Smuggled our political morality as the word of God Dio.Un then called upon to defend our interests. So what is God? It sounds like a rhetorical question and it is because we know the risposta.La already knew when we came here dentro.DIO is nothing but the great architect of the universe, who has not given the management of any religion has the truth verità.La located in the heart of each of us and we can take it alone without the distorting lens of religion. The truth is that in principle we should all recognize not do to others what you would not want done to yourself.
We were not expelled from Eden, we are simply not able to administer it.
Bruno Baldassin
May 2004.
0 comments:
Post a Comment